Thursday, December 23, 2010

The NCAA fails again

I've said it before and I'll say it again; the NCAA has to be one of the most corrupt and hypocritical organizations out there.


If you read the story, these guys are getting in trouble for receiving "improper benefits" and selling their stuff. I can understand how trading autographs for free tattoos is breaking some kind of rule, but selling personal rings, clothing, and awards? Let me say this again, it's THEIR STUFF! It should not matter that the stuff they sold originally came from the university or the NCAA. It was given to them. Permanently. Therefore, they can do whatever they want with it. It's not like they are taking unlimited practice gear, shoes, jerseys, etc., from the locker room and cashing in on it. They decided to sell stuff that may very well be irreplaceable. As much as I disagree with and can not imagine ever wanting to sell a Big Ten championship ring, or a traditional team award, that is their right to do so. If Cam Newton wants to sell his Heisman Trophy the day after he won, he should be allowed to. It's his. And don't even get me started on Cam Newton. He gets shopped around for $180,000 to different universities and he gets no punishment? But these guys get suspended five games for selling their own personal property?!? Oh right, it was only Cam's dad that did the shopping around, Cam didn't know anything about it. Riiiiiight.

Oh, and that these guys aren't suspended for the upcoming bowl game is laughable. Either they are in trouble, or they aren't. You can't pick and choose. But that's right, the schools and the NCAA line their pockets with millions of dollars by exploiting athletes letting these guys play. Ri-dic-u-lous.

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Google Voice iPhone app

Finally.

It looks like Apple came to their senses, and has seemingly given Google its blessing for a native Google Voice iPhone app.

For those of you that don't remember, a year or so ago, Apple initially approved an official GV app; only to pull it from the iTunes App Store. They gave the ridiculous reason that it "duplicated functionality", and thus, was not allowed. Everyone knew that was a load of crap, but for whatever reason Apple (and AT&T?) felt threatened by Google Voice and it's awesomeness. Let's hope the second time around they don't change their minds.

One of the main reasons I ditched my iPhone 3G was due to the lack of Google Voice support. Though it was frustrating at the time (I liked my iPhone for the most part), I'm glad I was "forced" to switch to Google and Android. The Android platform has some very nice features that I could see Apple never approving of. But we'll save that for a different day. Apple really dropped the ball on this one, at least for me. Because of the shenanigans they pulled with GV, they lost a customer, and I may never switch back.

Anyways, if you haven't checked out Google Voice yet, you should. (It's free to sign up for and use.) Especially if you are a smartphone user. With the addition of the iPhone app, I believe all of the major players now support GV. Here's a quick run-down of what you are missing out on by not using Google Voice:

  • FREE (as in beer) text messaging
  • Call screening
  • Visual voicemail
  • Voicemail transcription
  • Ring multiple phones by calling one number
  • Call recording
  • Cheap international calling
  • Block callers
  • Customized greetings
  • Access all of this from your computer via a web browser
  • and more...

If you are a smartphone user, the free text messaging is worth switching alone. Why on Earth people waste $5 - $15 dollars per month on something when you can get it for free is beyond me? Over years of use that can be a lot of money. I'm sure there are better things you would rather spend your cash on. So head on over to the App Store and get the free app.

Source: http://googlevoiceblog.blogspot.com/2010/11/google-voice-for-iphone.html

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Grooveshark


If you like Pandora, you really need to check out Grooveshark.com. I'm still not quite sure how Grooveshark works exactly, but you can search for any song, play it (over and over if wanted), save it to your Grooveshark library, add it to a playlist, or buy it. If you want continuous streaming music there is a radio that you can turn on. All you do is search for a song that you would like to start with, press play, then click on the radio button.Grooveshark will then continue playing similar genre songs. You can "like" or "dislike" each song just like Pandora. But unlike Pandora, you can skip as many as you want! Also, unlike Pandora, there are no annoying intrusive advertisements! There are ads on the side of the browser, but no annoying verbal ones.

The only downfall I see is that your library and favorites aren't unlimited; not sure what the limit is. I think you can even upload your own music, but I haven't had a need to try it out yet. Oh, there's no free mobile app, either. I think it runs $3/month.

Regardless of any shortcomings Grooveshark may have, it has Pandora soundly beat. No annoying ads, the ability to play any song you want as many times as you want, and the ability to skip unlimited songs when listening to their radio. Don't just take my word for it, go check it out! Grooveshark.com

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Elections, Politics, & Jesus

I hate elections because people are crazy. CRA-ZY. No matter what side you are on, or who you vote for, it defies all logic. Don't get me wrong, I vote just like everyone else, but that's the system that I'm a part of. It's amazing to me that people can't see that they aren't going to change anyone's moral convictions BECAUSE of politics. Politics provide no answers or solutions to anything...especially long term. Politics have become religion in the U.S., and it makes me really sad when I think about it. To see all these people I know spewing ridiculous, hateful words on Facebook, Twitter, Buzz, etc., all in the name of being a Democrat or Republican. "Just voted against the Nazis today!" "I voted against Communism!" Hmmm, yes. Now I see it! You are right. Please sign me up so I can be ridiculous with you too!

Voting has always been a lose - lose scenario for me, and probably always will be.

Republicans: like babies, abuses the environment, likes war, neglects the poor.
Democrats: hate babies, save the whales, anti-war, thinks everyone can be "right" at the same time (unless you don't think they are right).

Sorry. Maybe it's just me, but that sucks.

I'm also tired of people using the Bible and Jesus to support their political agendas. Guess what? Jesus was NOT political! In fact, he was just the opposite. Jesus only served God, and that's it. He was not an undercover Republican or Democrat, so please stop trying to show that Jesus is on "your side." Jesus said to love your neighbor and pray for your enemies. I don't see that happening anywhere in politics. If you want to see change in the community, country, or world, I suggest you stop with the political madness, and take Jesus' advice.

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Last day of summer

I've seen some places reporting that today, September 22nd, is the "first day of fall", but I have to disagree.

In North America the first day of fall begins with the autumn equinox. This year the autumn equinox occurs today at 11:09 p.m. Eastern Time. (UTC 3:09 a.m. 9/23/10) So technically, yes, the first moments of fall occur today. The first 51 minutes. (Even being on the West Coast you will only experience less than four hours of fall before the new day; all of which will be dark.) But really, today is the last day of summer, especially if you're on Eastern Time. When most people on the East Coast go to bed tonight, they likely will have spent all of their waking hours in summer.
The article I linked to above was posted at 10:22 a.m. ET, and is somewhat comical when you think about what they wrote. I quote: "Take a look at some of these fall photos we've collected from around the world." Oh really? You've already managed to collect fall photos from around the world when it's not even fall yet?!? (I know they are from the past, but the tone of the article seems to be talking in the present.) Wow. I knew that Flux Capacitor wasn't just a movie prop!

Though technically right, it's confusing and arguably misleading to call today the "first day of fall", when in fact, only 51 minutes of today occur in the fall. No one in North America will experience a full day (or even a majority day) of fall until September 23rd**.

I'm not completely serious when I make fun of the article I linked to, and there's probably some holes in my argument, but I don't care. It doesn't make sense to call today the first day of fall. If you want to say fall starts today, that makes much more sense. Anyways, with that being said, enjoy your last few hours of summer!

**Side note: You would think that the seasons would be proper nouns and capitalized (at least I do), but as far as I can tell, they are classified as common nouns. Considering when you say, "I went to the lake last summer.", you are talking about a specific time of the year, it seems like it should be Summer and not summer. Oh well, I never liked English class anyways .

Sunday, September 5, 2010

Tragedy to triumph

This story is pretty amazing. To say all of this just happened by pure chance is choosing to ignore the elephant in the room. Better have some tissue on hand, you just might need it:

http://www.annarbor.com/sports/um-football/from-never-to-walking-brock-mealer-will-lead-michigan-football-team-onto-field-saturday/

We don't have cable/satellite anymore, so I'm not sure if any network picked this up. It would be a shame if they didn't. Stuff like this should dominate the headlines, not all of the other crap that is usually reported on.

Friday, August 13, 2010

Chrome to Phone

This is really cool.



Wednesday, July 28, 2010

3D Technology

I don't get it. I just don't see what the hype is with 3D? I've seen a couple of movies, and the 3D effects distracted me from the movie. Not to mention the glasses were very annoying, and strained my eyes after about an hour.

Here's the thing though, I love new tech. I think it's great. If you read this blog you know I write about it frequently. If I was a bajillionaire, I would probably buy every new tech that came to market on day one. I realize I'm just one person with my own needs and wants, but I feel like 3D technology would/should be targeted towards people that share my sentiment. Besides my above mentioned dissatisfactions, to go all out 3D would require you not only to buy a new TV (starting around $1,500), but also a 3D capable Blu-ray DVD player (about $200 bucks), and the content to watch. That's a lot of money. Considering for only about $700 you can get a very nice 1080p HD TV, spending an additional $1,000 for 3D is a tough pill to swallow. And remember, these are the minimums you'll have to spend.

Also, there has been talk of content; sports, TV shows, video games, etc. But so far, there is very little offered. I mean, it's still not a common standard to broadcast everything in 1080p HD, let alone 3D. Then on top of all of this, you have the potential major problem of not having enough glasses for your friends. If you don't wear the glasses, you can't see 3D. Brand-name glasses run about $150 bucks. Each. Oh, did I mention your glasses might not work with your friends 3D TV of a different brand? Yikes. And now, all the major players are trying to release 3D cameras, video cameras, and gaming systems! Give me a break.

3D could be great. But it's just not there yet. As a tech fan, it seems like a big gimmick at this point. Maybe in five or ten years it will be common place, just like ten years ago not many people were toting smartphones; now everyone seems to have one. We're actually considering a new TV purchase in the next six to 12 months, and 3D isn't even on our radar. It wouldn't surprise me at all if this push for 3D everything turns out to be a giant flop. The technology just isn't polished enough, in my opinion. As soon as you can watch it without glasses, there's a legitimate stream of content, and the price comes down; I'll reconsider. Until then, I'm not buying.

Sources: Best Buy, Wikipedia

Thursday, July 22, 2010

Seattle, Portland, and rain*

I've got some news for you. The notion that Seattle and Portland get a lot of rain is pretty much entirely false. Both cities receive about 37 inches** of precipitation per year. In comparison, New York City receives almost 50 inches. That's right. New York City receives almost 13 inches more of precipitation per year than Seattle and Portland. You don't see many people complaining about NYC's rain, do you? (Well, at least I don't.) More examples:

Houston - 54
Chicago - 38
Atlanta - 50
Cleveland - 39
St. Louis - 39
Miami - 56

I think you get the point. Where the NW complainers do have a point, is with the frequency of the precipitation, and not the amount. Seattle and Portland average about 30 days more per year with days that have precipitation. (Precipitation is greater than or equal to 0.01 in.) Also, both cities are on the high side when it comes to cloudy days per year.

So, if I hear you complain about having "so much rain" in Seattle/Portland, don't be offended if I laugh. It's simply not true. If you complain about having another day of rain or clouds, I will try and feel your pain. But let's be real, if you are complaining that it's raining "again", and it only rains 0.01 in, you probably shouldn't be living in the NW!

*Please note: I'm using "rain" and "precipitation" interchangeably. I know, technically they are different. All rain is precipitation, but not all precipitation is rain.
**Also note: All figures are based on yearly averages.


Sources: Wikipedia, NOAA

Friday, July 16, 2010

Apple giving free cases to iPhone 4 buyers, refunds


Considering Apple's lack of response, or just downright asinine comments about the iPhone 4's antennae issue since its release 22 days ago, I gotta hand it to them. To borrow from Dumb & Dumber, they've totally redeemed themselves! Ok, not totally, but mostly. Anyone who has purchased an iPhone 4 can now get a free case courtesy of Apple. This offer is good until September 30th. Also, anyone who has already purchased a case can get a full refund. And as always, to state the obvious, you can still return your iPhone 4 for a full refund within 30 days of your purchase, if you are unhappy with it.

So what now? Well, for one, they didn't actually fix the problem. If you want to use your new iPhone 4 sans case, you still run the risk of having reception issues. What about after September 30th? Well, in Apple's defense, they said they would reevaluate when the time comes. Also, during the press conference Apple compared other smartphones claiming nearly all phones experience a drop in signal if held a certain way. That may be true, problem is, they left out the minor issue that the iPhone 4 experiences such a large drop in signal that it actually drops the call or loses connection to the data network. But you know, that's a minor issue. (Sarcasm.) Moreover, the phones they compared nearly have to be completely enclosed by your hand(s) before they experience problems, where as the iPhone 4 just needs one of your fingers. It's nice that they are giving out free cases, for sure, but until they address a hardware fix, the issue still exists.

Oh yeah, and remember that software update they said they were working on that would fix the problem? Turns out that was a lie. Big surprise there, huh?

Anyways, at least they finally fessed up to the problem (kind of). They had a Q & A afterwards that featured the usual beat-around-the-bush-non-answer to many questions. If you want to see more click on the source link below and check out the whole thing.

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/16/live-from-apples-iphone-4-press-conference/

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Android 2.2 (Froyo) vs. iOS 4: browser showdown

The fellows over at Engadget have just done a browser speed test between Apple's new iOS 4 and Android 2.2 (codename "Froyo") using an iPhone 4 and a Nexus One, respectively.

They tested speed on five different sites: BBC News, gdgt, The Onion, New York Times, and Engadget's own site. The two phones tied on three sites, and each loaded one site faster than the other. So that's a tie, right? Wrong. Android 2.2 has the ability to load Flash content, where iOS 4 does not. That alone gives the edge to Froyo in my opinion.

For a more definitive answer, they disabled flash in Android 2.2 and ran the tests again. The second time around gave Android the edge (albeit, usually slight) in four out of the five sites. The one site that Android didn't win was a tie.

Hit up the source link and watch their videos to decide for yourself.


Source: Android 2.2 (Froyo) versus iOS 4: the browser showdown (video) -- Engadget, Picture: Mashable.com

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Still having iPhone 4 reception issues?

Introducing the iHand



Photoshopping at it's finest!

Source: Geeky Gadgets

Friday, July 2, 2010

Apple & their tactics (antics?)

I am officially tired of them.

Not sure how many of you follow tech news out there, but since Apple released its new iPhone 4 it's definitely had its fair share of problems. Mainly, reception issues. (Links: 1 2 3 4.) Today they put out an official press release which finally addressed the problem. However, what they said is almost laughable. Here is the part I am talking about:


Upon investigation, we were stunned to find that the formula we use to calculate how many bars of signal strength to display is totally wrong. Our formula, in many instances, mistakenly displays 2 more bars than it should for a given signal strength. For example, we sometimes display 4 bars when we should be displaying as few as 2 bars. Users observing a drop of several bars when they grip their iPhone in a certain way are most likely in an area with very weak signal strength, but they don't know it because we are erroneously displaying 4 or 5 bars. Their big drop in bars is because their high bars were never real in the first place.

To fix this, we are adopting AT&T's recently recommended formula for calculating how many bars to display for a given signal strength. The real signal strength remains the same, but the iPhone's bars will report it far more accurately, providing users a much better indication of the reception they will get in a given area. We are also making bars 1, 2 and 3 a bit taller so they will be easier to see.

We will issue a free software update within a few weeks that incorporates the corrected formula. Since this mistake has been present since the original iPhone, this software update will also be available for the iPhone 3GS and iPhone 3G.



Ridiculous. This has nothing to do with actually fixing the reception, and does nothing to explain why the signal drop occurs in the first place. All this will do is better show how many bars of coverage (or lack thereof) you currently have. Their software update will do absolutely nothing to fix dropped calls that are being caused by an external antennae being touched.

This just adds to the list another ridiculous excuse coming out of Cupertino. I've seen bad ones before, but this nearly takes the cake. No amount of software updates will fix a hardware/design issue. This so called "fix", is no fix at all. Maybe this is why my next phone will be of the Android kind.

Thursday, June 17, 2010

ESPN & Technology

I've always liked how ESPN ran things. In my opinion, no one covers sports better, and this is probably a big reason why:

http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/12/editorial-espn-bypasses-corporate-red-tape-with-ipad-and-xbox-3/

(My one complaint: even though they are doing a good job covering the World Cup, I wish they would show more soccer during the year. One MLS game a week is lame. European soccer shown very sporadically. And can anyone say baseball overload every summer?)

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

AT&T losing its iPhone exclusivity soon?

Speaking of AT&T, they announced recently that anyone eligible for an upgrade in 2010 will be able to cash in early and get the new iPhone 4 at the full discounted rate; after signing a new two year contract, of course. Cool, I guess? But why? Well, I have a theory that AT&T will be losing their exclusivity in the not-so-distant future. Admittedly, this would be very un-Apple like with the timing, seeing how nothing was mentioned at their most recent keynote presentation. The odds of an announcement offering the iPhone on another U.S. carrier this fall or winter is unlikely at best. Still, it doesn't really make much sense for AT&T to offer early upgrades of up to six months in advance to existing customers. Sure, they lock you into another two years of monthly premiums, but that's not a good enough reason for me at this point. Also, I find it highly unlikely that AT&T is doing this to "be nice" to their customers. I mean think about it; if you knew one of your competitors (especially Verizon) was going to be getting the iPhone too, wouldn't you want to renew as many iPhone contracts as you possibly could before said announcement? That's what I thought. As unlikely as it may be, don't say I didn't warn you if sometime around Christmas 2010 or early 2011 it's announced other carriers are getting the iPhone.

Something is just fishy about the whole thing. It's hard to believe there isn't something else going on behind the scenes that we're not aware of. Oh well, I guess only time will tell.

Source: AT&TEngadget (Picture)

Monday, June 14, 2010

More proof U.S. phone carriers rip us off; especially AT&T


I've always felt that the U.S. cell phone carriers have been ripping us off for years, especially when it comes to texting plans (don't even get me started), and this just adds fuel to the fire. Vodafone UK accidentally posted their upcoming iPhone 4 plan details a little early (only to be taken down), and I think I almost cried. Before I joined a family plan, I used to pay about $86 for an iPhone that had 450 minutes, 200 texts, and "unlimited" data. This was after I paid $199 for the iPhone. 

To be fair, AT&T just started offering a $15 data plan for the iPhone that provides you 200Mb of data. So that $86 would drop to $71. Also, AT&T includes free night & weekend minutes, which it appears that the above plans do not. However, I personally rarely use more than 300 minutes total in a month, so the free night & weekends means nothing to me.

With that being said, as you can see above, the 600 minute plan for roughly $52/month and a purchase price of $131, blows AT&T out of the water. For $19 less a month you get more minutes, unlimited texting, 5x the data, and a cheaper phone price. 

For us Americans, we have some hope with T-Mobile and Sprint offering cheaper plans. However, they can lack sufficient coverage and/or quality phones. But hey, at least when you sign up with AT&T you get a complimentary punch in the face for your extra hard-earned dollars.


Sunday, June 13, 2010

Robben Island

If you haven't watched this yet, you probably should. Duration: 18:37



Thursday, June 3, 2010

The (surprising?) truth about what motivates us

It's 10 minutes long, but worth it. Even if just for the creative presentation.


Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Purse thieves get what they deserve

FYI - No sound.


Friday, May 7, 2010

New and improved Google Spreadsheets

If you haven't noticed or tried the newest version of Google Spreadsheets, it's definitely worth the switch. To switch, just look to the upper right corner when in a spreadsheet and click on "New version". With the new version, you'll find a new and improved user interface, faster loading and processing, better data entry functions, and more. It's nice to see Google slowly but surely keep improving Google Docs to be more Office-like. As it stands, the vast majority of users will be able to get by with only using Google Docs, and not needing to ever use MS Office or something similar. With free, anywhere access like this, it will definitely make you think twice before laying down more of your cold hard cash to upgrade to the newest desktop office software. Especially for the basic user.

They also have a new "Drawing" app that lets you quickly and easily create diagrams, or add text and/or free hand drawings to an existing image.

Click here for Google's official press release.

Saturday, April 24, 2010

NCAA expands college football to 35 bowl games

To become bowl eligible, your team must finish the season 6-6 or better. I've never really thought that being 6-6 was such a great accomplishment that it deserved an extra game at the end. But I always played along. However, this expansion just reinforces my point. How much more watered-down can these meaningless games become? I mean come on, not to state the obvious, but 6-6 is just one game better than a losing season! You should have to be 7-5, in my opinion, but that's neither here nor there.

Anyways, this now means that 70 out of 120 FBS (Football Bowl Subdivision, a.k.a., Division I) schools will get to go to a bowl game. Wow, what a privilege. 58% of all teams can now "earn" a bowl bid. In comparison, only 65 (likely soon to be 68**) out of 347 men's basketball teams make it into the NCAA tournament. That's 19% (or 20% with 68 teams).

Sadly this is just another ploy for more money. Instead of the NCAA wasting time with expanding the bowl system, they should be working on something the fans actually want. (As well as the players, many would argue.) Like, oh, I don't know, maybe figuring out how to organize a playoff system so there can be a true champion?

I hate how corrupt the NCAA is at the top. I know, you probably couldn't tell, huh? Where's the DCAA (Democratic Collegiate Athletic Association) when you need it. 

Source: ESPN

**At least they didn't totally mess up March Madness by expanding to 96 teams. I can live with 68; even endorse it. Now I just wish they would make the play-in games bubble teams playing for a spot at maybe a 10 or 12 seed, instead of for a 16 seed as it stands now.

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Papa John's Pizza has an amazing special


Monday, April 19, 2010

Big Mountains

I was doing some reading on the world's highest/tallest/biggest mountains. It turns out there are a few definitions. You'll get one answer based on highest elevation, a different based on total height, and another based on total height starting from the Earth's core. Click here to see a nice summary of what I'm talking about. However, one definition that makes a lot of sense to me that seems to have no official standing, is the continuous rise in elevation that you would essentially have to climb in order to reach the summit. Or more simply, the Valley To Summit elevation, or what I'm going to call "VTS".

A couple of examples:
  • Mount Everest in Nepal has the highest elevation at 29,029 ft (8,848 m) above sea level. As Everest's base sits on the Tibetan Plateau at about 17,000 ft (5,200 m), the VTS elevation is only about 12,000 ft (3,658 m). 
  • Mauna Kea is the tallest mountain (when measuring from the sea floor) at over 30,000 ft (9,144 m). But again, the VTS elevation (in this case sea level because it's an island) is only 13,803 ft (4,207 m).
So what is the mountain with the largest Valley To Summit elevation you ask? Well, to be sure, I don't know. As mentioned above, there is no official list that I could find. However, here are the two biggest that I could locate:
  • Mount McKinley has the biggest change. At 20,320 ft (6,194 m) above sea level, the VTS ends up being over 18,000 ft (5,500 m) as the valley floor sits at only 2,000 ft (610 m). That's 1.5 times larger than Mount Everest. Now that's a mountain!
  • Mount Kilimanjaro comes in second at 19,341 ft (5,895 m) above sea level. It has a VTS elevation of approximately 15,100 ft (4,600 m) from the surrounding valley.
The Valley To Summit measurement makes the most sense to me because it essentially tells you the minimum amount of mountain you would have to climb to get to the top; if you were standing at what the average person would consider the "bottom". To me, it shows the "real" vertical rise. Think about it, if you are looking at a trail that goes to the top of a mountain, what's one of the first things you consider? The vertical change.

Now, I'm sure some smarty-pants out there will say, "What about a peak's prominence? Isn't that what you are talking about?" You would be close, but not exactly right. I thought topographic prominence was what I pictured VTS being equal to. But it's not. In my opinion, the geography geeks got too nerdy and messed up the definition when they made it. I mean, does it really matter how Mount McKinley relates to a taller peak in Argentina? Maybe. But not to the average Joe Shmoe, or even the average hiker. Oh well, maybe VTS will start catching on as an official stat. I can only hope.

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Drag & Drop email attachments in Gmail (Finally!)

Google announced earlier today that you can now drag & drop files into Gmail to attach them to your message, instead of having to browse for the file like usual. Right now it only works with Google's Chrome browser, and Firefox 3.6.

They also made a nice improvement that brings tighter integration with Gmail and Google Calendar, which aides in shared calendar use. In addition, you can now insert a calendar invite into your message without switching to Google Calendar.

To read up on the full details click the following links for details:

Gmail Drag & Drop

Gmail and Calendar Invitations

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Opera Mini Web Browser - iPhone App

As far as I know, this is the first legitimate third party web browser that Apple has approved for use; which is a pretty big accomplishment in itself. If you haven't tried it yet, or even heard of it, I would suggest you give it a try. My time with it has shown to have much faster load times on almost any page compared to the native Safari browser. Also, it has a "tab" feature that I prefer over the page switching of Safari, and other features such as a "Speed Dial" page for quick access to frequently visited sites. Although, as nice as some of it features are, I have noticed two pretty big shortcomings:

1. It doesn't seem to load the iPhone formatted web apps like Safari does. For example, any Google web app does not load like you would be familiar with. You either have to deal with the basic HTML site, or the generic mobile web site. This also happens with other sites such as ESPN, Facebook, Wikipedia, and I'm sure just about everything else.

2. Zooming and multitouch don't work as expected. You single tap to zoom, which can be pretty handy actually, but, there is no fine tuning with pinch-to-zoom support. This leaves you stuck with either viewing the entire page, or a single element. There is no in between.

If they can fix these two problems it would be a five star app, no question. For now I give it about three out of five, as it doesn't take advantage of the full iPhone experience, but it's pretty dang fast. However, if you surf full web sites on a regular basis, this will soon become your preference over Safari.

Opera Mini Web Browser (Caution: Launches iTunes)

Thursday, April 8, 2010

iPhone OS 4.0

Apple had their release preview of what the next iPhone operating system (OS) will include. There are over 100 new user features, but here's the rundown of the top seven:
  1. Multitasking - Just what you think it is. You will be able to run multiple third party apps at the same time, with an easy way to switch between the open apps. To quote Steve Jobs, "Now we weren't the first to this party, but we're gonna be the best. Just like cut and paste." If multitasking works as well as cut and paste, he will probably be right. Also, this is big for the iPad in many ways. Will you be able to turn your iPad into a phone via Skype? Let's hope so. The potential to have unlimited data and VOIP calling over 3G for $30/month just got that much closer to reality.
  2. Folders - Again, just what you think. Will be able to organize your apps into folders. Can even put folders in the bottom dock. This will be nice, no more swiping through six home screens to find what  you are looking for. Used to be limited to 180 apps on your phone, now you can have up to 2,160. (Who would ever have that many apps? I have no idea.)
  3. Enhanced Mail - Unified inbox, multiple Exchange accounts, fast inbox switching, organize by thread (This is a big one for me. So annoying not having it.), open attachments with apps.
  4. iBooks - Meh, whatever. More money for them. I get it. Most likely useless for many people. Will have some nice sync functions between multiple devices, and you get Winnie the Pooh for free!
  5. Enterprise Support for multiple Exchange accounts, Exchange Server 2010, new VPN options, better data protection, mobile device management, wireless app distribution.
  6. Game Center - Hello social gaming network. Play against your friends or other people. Keep track of stats and whatnot.
  7. iAd - Mobile advertising. First impression: blah. But developers need to make money, so now they have an easier/better way to put ads in apps. Also, up till this point, Apple wasn't getting a slice of the advertising pie, as all ads were being provided by third parties. Ads will keep you in your app when you click on them instead of booting you out to Safari. Can be interactive. Apple sells and hosts the ads. Revenue will be split 60/40 developer to Apple. Everything is done in HTML5. (Ha! Nice jab at Flash, Steve.) Ads can be so interactive that they are almost an app inside an app. Games, video clips, maps, music, and more. It actually is pretty impressive how interactive the ad can be, all while keeping you in the original app. Nothing like the old iPhone ads. All-in-all, this probably won't dramatically increase ads in free apps (probably some though); it's just now Apple is officially in the advertising business. Can't believe I talked about ads this much, but ads get the developers money for their free apps. (Not to mention money for Apple, too.) Apps is what the iPhone is all about. So, Apple wants as many apps as possible. Comprende?
iPhone OS will be available this summer for the iPhone 3GS and iPod touch 3rd gen (most recent). Here's the big bummer though, older versions of the iPhone and iPod touch won't support all features. Namely, multitasking. OUCH. You know what though? I have an iPhone 3G, and it already feels slow. I mean, it is almost two years old. I can't imagine it being able to handle multitasking on top of its current slowness. So, even though it sucks to have to buy a new phone to get multitasking, it's probably for the best. Not saying I will be buying the next iPhone for the sake of multitasking, just saying in general.
The iPad will be getting 4.0 this fall. Why the long wait? Not sure.

Some other notes: About the only thing missing that I was expecting/hoping for was some sort of Exposé/widget function. Especially on the iPad. When Steve was asked about it he said, "Anything is possible." Also, when asked if there were plans to support Flash or java being supported, he answered plainly, "No." 
As far as closing applications when you are done using them, According to Apple, "You don't have to." "In multitasking, if you see a task manager... they blew it."

I for one will enjoy the update. The folders and enhanced mail are worth it alone. What do you think? Excited about this? Leaves you wanting more?


For images and the full details of the iPhone OS 4.0 event, you can go here to Engadget.com.

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Honda U3-X Personal Mobility Device

This thing is dope! Small, portable, and easy to store transportation. Not sure how well it would handle bumps and uneven terrain, but pretty cool none-the-less. Definitely could see these catching on in big cities if they could make them cheap enough.

Check out the video over at Engadget.com

Friday, April 2, 2010

Possible/Probable expansion of March Madness

I really hope this is an April Fool's Day joke, but sadly, I don't think it is.

During the last couple of days, the sports world is reporting that the NCAA is considering the likely expansion of March Madness to 96 teams. That's right. Ninety-six.

The purpose of a tournament is to find the best team and crown them champion. So that means only "the best" teams should get into the tournament to begin with. By having so many teams, all you do is dilute the tournament as a whole.

  • Fact 1: A #16 seed has never beaten a #1 seed. (I'm sure it will happen some day, but that's beside the point.)
  • Fact 2: The highest seed to ever win the tournament was Villanova in 1985, who was #8. That would have made them somewhere around the 32nd best team going into the tournament. 

Right now there are 65 teams. Does anyone really think that a team coming into the tournament ranked in the 40's or higher will actually win the whole thing? Well, I'm sure someone does, but I'm sure someone believes there's a leprechaun living in their closet, too. You get my point.

So what will having 96 teams accomplish? Oh, that's right, money. The NCAA is after your money. Which is the main reason college football still doesn't have a playoff. The bowl system makes the NCAA (and schools) way too much moola for them to change anything; except maybe add more bowl games.

On top of all of this, the NCAA is so hypocritical is makes me sick. They claim one of the main reasons they won't do a football playoff is because the athletes would have to miss too much class. But then they turn around and are talking about expanding one of the biggest tournaments in all of college sports. (Not to mention the fact that the lower level football schools already have a playoff system.) Right now, teams go home for a couple of days between the weekends of playing. With the current expansion proposal, that would not be possible, as they would have games starting on Tuesdays. (i.e., they miss more class time.)

I see an expansion to 96 teams doing a few things, much of which I have gathered from the combination of many sources:
  1. The regular season ceases to matter. This is the biggest issue, in my opinion. If everyone and their brother gets in, who will truly care about their regular season games?
  2. Conference tournaments suffer as the best teams let their benches play most of the time.
  3. We watch an additional "half-round" of opening games with some of the most boring upsets anyone has ever seen. Will we really care if the 96th best team beats the 36th best team? Or if the 10th best Big East team beats the 9th best Big 12 team? Probably not.
  4. People stop caring about filling out brackets because it becomes a mental chore, all culminating in...
  5. The death of the best thing that happens in sports all year. Its mutilated remains laid at the altar of the almighty dollar.
Going back to the fact that a #16 has never beaten a #1, none, and I repeat none, of the additional teams that would get in under a 96 team bracket (teams 66 - 96) would have a realistic chance of winning the whole tournament. NONE.

The bottom line: the NCAA is considering this expansion to line their pockets, and not for the integrity of the game.

I propose the creation of a new authority in college athletics. The DCAA. The Democratic Collegiate Athletic Association. If there was a vote on what the fans and players wanted to see in college sports, I can almost guarantee that the majority of people want the best tournament in college sports, March Madness, left alone, and they want to see a true champion in college football determined by a playoff.

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Just say "no" to wasteful junk mail coupons

If you are anything like me, you get tired of seeing the spam/junk mail "coupons" that show up every few days in your mailbox. The one I'm referring to is RedPlum coupons. (RedPlum.com) They seem to follow me everywhere I go, even when I change states! They are especially annoying as 99.9% of their coupons do not apply to me. I think the only ones I have ever used are for fast food. (Which we all could use less of I'm sure!) For me, all I can think of when I see them is, "Great, more waste."

For some reason the thought had never previously crossed my mind, but I finally decided to get off their mailing list. So, for the people out there that share my displeasure, I have streamlined the not-so-obvious process to unsubscribe from their mailing list; just click the link below and pick the appropriate answers to begin the process:

http://www.valassis.com/1024/Contact/contact_home.aspx

It only takes about two minutes, which will be well worth the long term satisfaction of less junk mail. Oh yeah, the one catch is that you have to unsubscribe again after five years.

Google Maps Aerial View (Not Satellite view)

One of two things: Either I am out of the loop, or this is brand new. I'm starting to think it is the latter, as I have done multiple searches for "Google Maps Aerial View" and found nothing. (I can't even find an official Google source for it.)

So what's the story? Well, I just happened to come across certain areas where Google has taken a page from Bing's "Bird's Eye" view. So far, I have found two areas in California:

San Jose --> Oakland --> Berkeley --> Richmond

Chula Vista --> San Diego --> UCSD --> Del Mar

In these areas, you can switch to an Aerial view, giving you a new view angle with higher quality pics. Embedding doesn't seem to work yet, so go to the following links and look for the Aerial button in the upper right corner:

UC Berkeley Campus

Petco Park, Downtown San Diego

Anyone else know about this yet? Any other areas out there have this?

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Send multiple SMS with Google Voice

If you haven't noticed yet, I'm a fan of Google Voice. Today, they made a relatively minor but very useful improvement; the ability to send multiple text messages at the same time. Until now, you were stuck with copy-and-pasting the same message to multiple people. Now you can "OMG my yorkie is so LOL I'm ROFL!!! BRB. GTG. L8R!!" to your BFF's all at once. (Only up to five at a time, though.) You can find the full details at the official Google Voice Blog. Oh yeah, all of this texting is FREE with Google Voice.

Friday, January 29, 2010

Photoshop

In general, Photoshop (or any other photo editing software) is great. You can fix smudges, get rid of glare, adjust colors, make funny captions, etc. These features are nice, but at the same time it can be a love-hate relationship.
Call me old fashioned, but I like looking at pictures of places I've been, people I've gone there with, and the things I've done and saying to myself, "That's how it looked." I like to see what it actually looked like...not some fairytale land. For instance, our wedding pictures. Awesome. Seriously could not have been better. However, when I'm flipping through them there are some where the colors have clearly been enhanced. Don't get me wrong, it makes a great picture, but was that "how it looked"? No. And that's fine. It was a beautiful sunny day that I will never forget. I really didn't need Photoshop to make it any better.
Photo editing is great, but just be careful. Sometimes you just can't make the real-deal any better.

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

The Apple iPad (Update)


Today Apple released it's newest product...the iPad. It's essentially a ginormous iPod touch with the option of getting 3G data. Overall, it's pretty cool, I suppose. Seems well built and is easy on the eyes. However, I think they have a few problems on their hands:

  1. Limited market. Right now I just don't see a very big market for this. This is clearly Apple's shot at the netbook market. It's essentially a web-surfing device that starts at $499. (Netbooks are half the price with better hardware specs. Granted, the iPhone OS is possibly worth the premium on its own.) I can kind of see why some people would like this for around the house or traveling; but for me it's a hard sell. If you have a laptop already, I don't think there is any way this appeals to you. Your laptop has way more functionality (it's a real computer) and nearly just as portable. So why would you need to drop another $499 for this? You don't. If you already have an iPod touch/iPhone, the iPad doesn't bring much to the table except a bigger screen, and better iWork functionality, which would only apply to a very small group of people I would have to think. If all you had was a desktop and an iPod touch/iPhone, I could maybe see the iPad being appealing to you. This is obviously what Apple is banking on.
  2. No multitasking. Granted, this may come with iPhone OS 4.0, but even basic netbooks can multitask.
  3. No camera. You would think there would be at least a front facing camera for video chat, no? If there was ever a device made for video chat, this would be it. On top of that, this is obviously portable enough that you could take it anywhere you normally go with a backpack, this would be perfect for taking pictures, and then sharing them via 3G when on the road.
  4. No flash. I hate flash websites. They bog down my computer no matter what I'm using. But the fact of the matter is, flash is pretty popular and the iPad doesn't support it. Most other netbooks do.
  5. Hard Drive storage. This thing is obviously targeted for multimedia usage: photos, music, games, movies, ebooks, etc. Starting at only 16 GB, that could fill up very quickly. If they double that we could start making a case for it.
  6. Last but not least, the name. Seriously, iPad? What were they thinking? The last thing I want to be reminded of every time I use my new, cool device, is a feminine product. Well, Apple has just made my worst nightmare come true. Thanks.
I guess I can see how some people could find this useful, but there isn't anything mind-blowing about it. No matter if you love it or hate it, one thing is for sure; NEVER buy 1st generation products from Apple. They inevitably drop the price and/or add more features and/or upgrade the specs within the first few months. Look at the original iPhone. Within two months they dropped the price by $200. If you were patient enough to wait for the 2nd gen iPhone, you were treated to a far superior device. I learned my lesson with the 1st gen unibody Macbooks. Within a couple of months Apple added firewire and an SD card slot. Never again, Apple, never again.

  • Update: You know what? After digging a little deeper and watching this video of the iPad in action, I may be changing how I feel about it. It does seem to be a really slick and user friendly way of browsing the web and viewing multimedia; which is exactly what Apple was planning on. To be used as a stay-connected-email-facebook-twitter-multimedia-viewer it seems more than capable. I wouldn't be surprised if it sells really well. This looks like it would be the perfect size to take on a plane to watch movies or play games with. This could be the perfect product for Apple to attract new customers that haven't taken the plunge for an iPod, iPhone or Macbook. It won't appeal to the "power" business users, but I don't think Apple intended it to. Besides the lack of a market, I still stand behind my original arguments. Also, even with becoming more favorable towards the iPad, I would still wait for the 2nd generation!

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

High Fructose Corn Syrup


I don't know if you've seen them, but there are now commercials on TV promoting the use of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS). I find this disturbing, at best. The problem isn't necessarily with HFCS itself (though, there is evidence that suggests your body is negatively affected by how it processes HFCS); the problem with HFCS is that it is almost exclusively found in processed foods. Many beverages and other processed foods made with HFCS are high in calories and low in nutritional value. Regularly including these products in your diet has the potential to promote obesity; which, in turn, promotes conditions such as type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, and heart disease.

The commercials that I've seen are no doubt trying to make a correlation between HFCS and eating foods containing it as being "healthy". Their main argument: it comes from corn. Using that argument, manure must be good to eat too...it comes from a cow!

True, if you look it up there will be "studies" that show HFCS is no more dangerous than natural sugar. First of all, as mentioned above, HFCS alone isn't the entire problem. Second, these studies are heavily sponsored (i.e., influenced) by the HFCS industry. If I want to know the risks/benefits of snake oil, I surely won't be asking scientists that are sponsored by snake oil salesmen.

To wrap it up...please don't fall for the hype. High fructose corn syrup is primarily used in processed foods. Processed foods are bad for you. The rest should be easy to figure out!


Source 1 Source 2 Source 3

Google Voice updates iPhone web app

Until today, Google Voice on the iPhone was a pain, to say the least. This long awaited update mirrors the Gmail web app that Google has been running for quite some time now. They have incorporated use of HTML5 to make it run faster and better functioning apps right from your browser. For example, browsing contacts has become much more user friendly as there is now a "Top" list that is automatically populated with your most frequently contacted people.
It is by no means perfect, though. It still looks like there is no instant notification capability, which is a pretty big problem for most users. However, short of a native iPhone app, this is about as good as it can get. Watch the video for a quick tour:



Or, visit the official Google Voice Blog for the full press release.

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Expenseus.com

Ever go on a trip with a group of people and tried to equally share some of the costs? Yeah, me too. Did it all work out? Kind of. It can be a pretty big hassle trying to keep track of everything, huh? That's where Expenseus.com comes in. To quote part of their website:

      "Managing group expenses can be a social and logistical nightmare! If you are consistently spending money with the same people, you'll inevitably owe someone back, or they'll owe you. It's a hassle to keep track of all these exchanges, and when the time comes for reckoning how you stand with each other, it’s impossible to remember who owes whom, and everyone wonders if they got paid back."

Expenseus.com is an awesome web application that keeps track of all of the expenses for your group. Once everyone has entered in all of the expenses, you get a nice report showing the minimum amount of transactions needed to equal out all of the shared costs.

For example: Let's say Jimmy owes Bobby $10, and Bobby owes Suzie $10. Much of the time the transaction goes like this; Jimmy gives Bobby $10. Then, the next day Bobby gives that same $10 to Suzie. With Expenseus, the middle-man gets cut out. It knows that Jimmy should just pay Suzie $10 bucks and everything is square.

If you go on frequent group trips or consistently share expenses with the same people, this tool could be your next BFF. Best of all, the site is free to use!

Friday, January 22, 2010

Survival

Actually, S.U.R.V.I.V.A.L.

Size up the situation
Undo haste makes waste
Remember where you are
Vanquish fear and panic
Improvise
Value living
Act like the natives
Live by your wits

(Some quick background info...I took an outdoor survival class a couple of years ago, which was very informative.  One of the first things they taught us was the S.U.R.V.I.V.A.L. acronym.)

Over the last week or so, we've seen a few episodes of this show called I Shouldn't Be Alive. The episode we just saw was about two hikers that had gotten lost, and by dumb luck they made it out alive and even unhurt. They truly should not have been alive based on the decisions they made.  The thing I've noticed the most about the show, is that people end up in bad spots usually because they panic.

S.U.R.V.I.V.A.L. is a nice little acronym to remember, but it's not necessarily in order of importance. "Vanquish fear and panic" and "Value living" should be tied for #1, in my opinion. Once you've given up mentally, you're done. I Shouldn't Be Alive is sometimes counter-intuitive; usually people survive because they don't give up, but I've definitely seen a few shows (like today) where people survived despite giving up. Hopefully people are paying attention to what they are watching. I hope they are learning from people's mistakes, and not copying them!

"Mind over matter" is more real than most people realize. If you're in a survival situation and you think you're going to die, then you probably will.

Saturday, January 16, 2010

San Luis Obispo expands tobacco laws

Give one up for fast moving government! (For once.) In December, the city council unanimously voted to adopt new no smoking and tobacco use laws. January 15th was the frist day that the expanded laws took effect within the city limits of SLO.

"The law bans smoking in any city park, all open spaces, and at sporting facilities. It also applies to dog parks, public transportation facilities, Mission Plaza and the creek walk."

The law mostly targets smokers, but also applies to any tobacco product, including chewing tobacco. (Not mentioned in the source link.)

Fines start at $100 for the first offense; $200 for the second; then $500 for each additional offense within a 12 month period.

Fun fact: In 1990, San Luis Obispo became the first municipality in the world to ban smoking in all public places. (Allegedly.)

Fun fact #2: SLO also has a "no drive-through" ordinance. Fast food, banks, ATMs, etc., are not allowed to have drive-throughs. That's right, your lazy butt has to walk if you want your double cheeseburger to-go in SLO.

Supposedly, there is going to be further consideration to expand the no smoking/tobacco use laws even more. There's talk that the entire downtown area (or even the entire city limits) could become a no smoking zone outside of private property. I'm all for no smoking, but this is a free country after all. I feel like these most recent laws are a good thing. But, expanding much more than this might be going too far. If you say it's illegal to walk down a public sidewalk and smoke at the same time, what's next? No bubble-gum chewing in public places? I guess we'll see what city council decides on. What do you think? Do these current laws go too far? Not far enough?


Thursday, January 7, 2010

How to link multiple Gmail accounts

With everything that we involve ourselves in, many people end up having multiple email accounts used for different purposes. I personally have a "Friends & Family" email that I only give to my, you guessed it, friends & family. I then have a "Business" email that I use for everything else. So far the system has worked great. It keeps all of the email reminders that I get from my credit cards, cell phone bill, utilities, promotions, etc., separate from my personal email. This way it is easy to log into one account and see only the applicable emails.
However, after using this system for years (and having logged into and out of the two accounts countless times) I started looking for a better way to organize my digital mail. Also, now being in the age of mobile access, keeping track of multiple accounts was that more of a nuisance on my phone.
I finally settled on a simple but effective forwarding system. I now forward my mail from my Business account to my Friends & Family account. Then, by using the "Labels" and "Filters" in Gmail, I automatically organize my incoming mail. I then can reply to any message from my sole account and designate which email address I use to reply with. Pretty nice, huh? Here's what I did:

Step 1: Forward Your Secondary Email Address

1.  Log into your Secondary email account. In the upper right corner click on Settings.

2. Click on the Forwarding and POP/IMAP tab.

3. Under Forwarding, select the radio button: Forward a copy of incoming mail to

 


4. In the text box enter the email address you want your mail forwarded to. (Your primary email.)

5. The last drop-down menu gives you three options:


Select the appropriate option of your liking. I chose the Archive option for two reasons. One, it keeps the email so I can reference it later if needed. Two, it moves the email out of the Inbox. I like this, as it won't show up in two different inboxes on my iPhone.

Step 2: Set Up "Send mail as"

1.  Log into your Primary email account. In the upper right corner click on Settings.

2. Click on the Accounts and Import tab.

3. In the Send mail as section, click on the button Send mail from another address.






4. A new dialog box opens up. Enter the information for your Secondary email address.














5. Gmail makes you verify your secondary email address. Just follow the directions. (You will have to log into your secondary account to complete the verification process.)











That's it! If you want to stop here you can. Once you verify everything, your secondary email will now show up in your primary inbox. For some people stopping here will be fine. I like to be a little more organized though.

In my Primary account, I created a new label. (I just named it my secondary email. i.e., example@gmail.com). From there I created a new filter:

1. Under the Filters tab click, Create a new filter.

2. In the To: field, enter your Secondary email address.






3. Next is the Choose action page. Select the Apply the label: check-box. Choose the label you created for your Secondary email.








4. Click Create Filter.

Now you're really done! When an email comes in that was forwarded from your secondary account, it will automatically be labeled as such.

Also, in my opinion this is the best part; when you reply to an email you will have the option of changing which email account you reply with! You can send and receive for both accounts from one place!

With this setup, all of your digital mail is in one place, accessible any time, on any device that has internet access.  With the labels, you can easily separate each account if needed. And, if you ever want to go back to two separate accounts all you have to do is stop forwarding your email from your secondary account.

Even if you don't have two Gmail accounts, I imagine you can still do this. All you have to do is forward your non-Gmail to your Gmail; then follow the steps for creating labels and filters.

I've only been using this system for a short time, but so far I really like it. Hopefully it can help you too!

    Friday, January 1, 2010

    US Government launches Distraction.gov

    Distraction.gov

    Don't be a distracted driver!



    Here's a much more graphic commercial put out by our friends across the pond: